Showing posts tagged environment
We are not the radicals. The radicals are the ones who are changing the chemical composition of the atmosphere for money.
Bill McKibben (via socialuprooting)
(Reblogged from socialuprooting)
(Reblogged from mohandasgandhi)
Alliance for Justice today released a report looking at how money donated by the Koch brothers—”the billionaires behind the curtain”—indirectly supports the polluter defendants in one of the Supreme Court’s biggest cases of the 2010-11 term, American Electric Power v. Connecticut. At stake in the case is the ability of states and private parties to sue the five largest U.S. emitters of carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas, to cap and reduce their global warming emissions.

AFJ’s analysis shows that the Kochs have financially supported, or have personal connections with, 16 institutions that are linked to eight of the amicus briefs filed in support of defendants. The five defendant utilities in the case together discharge 650 million tons of carbon dioxide per year, which is about 25 percent of the U.S. electric power sector’s annual carbon dioxide emissions, and about 10 percent of overall U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from human activities. Koch Industries is itself one of the top-ten air polluters in the United States.
(Reblogged from diadoumenos)

Five-year drilling plan, no new offshore drilling will be allowed off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts or in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico

From an email I received from Oceana:

Today, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announced that in the new five-year drilling plan, no new offshore drilling will be allowed off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts or in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico.

The Administration had previously indicated support for exploration in the Atlantic Ocean, as well as in the Eastern Gulf. However, they now proposed a 5 year ban on new drilling. Plus, they announced the start of a new process to reconsider drilling in the Arctic’s Beaufort Sea, building on President Obama’s commitment to science and preparedness.

Jackie Savitz
Senior Campaign Manager, Pollution Campaign
Oceana

(Emphasis mine. Wtf is a “new process to reconsider…”? I guess I should just be happy about the good news part of this.)

(Reblogged from diadoumenos)

So strong was the antibusiness sentiment for the first Earth Day in 1970 that organizers took no money from corporations and held teach-ins “to challenge corporate and government leaders.”

Forty years later, the day has turned into a premier marketing platform for selling a variety of goods and services, like office products, Greek yogurt and eco-dentistry…

To many pioneers of the environmental movement, eco-consumerism, creeping for decades, is intensely frustrating and detracts from Earth Day’s original purpose.

“This ridiculous perverted marketing has cheapened the concept of what is really green,” said Denis Hayes, who was national coordinator of the first Earth Day and is returning to organize this year’s activities in Washington. “It is tragic.”

(Reblogged from diadoumenos)

The More Things Change…

ryking:

…the more they stay the same.

March 31, 2010: “Obama to Propose More Oil Drilling in Gulf.”

June 18, 2008: “Bush Urges Congress to End Coastal Drilling Ban.”

And oh, what a difference almost two years make:

By urging lawmakers to lift the federal ban and work with coastal states to open up more areas of the outer continental shelf to exploration, Bush is reinforcing a similar proposal endorsed yesterday by John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate, opposes it.
(Reblogged from diadoumenos)

ryking:

jasencomstock:

ryking:

abcsoupdot:

sexartandpolitics:

Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time - NYTimes.com

The proposal is intended to reduce dependence on oil imports, generate revenue from the sale of offshore leases and help win political support for comprehensive energy and climate legislation.

But while Mr. Obama has staked out middle ground on other environmental matters — supporting nuclear power, for example — the sheer breadth of the offshore drilling decision will take some of his supporters aback. And it is no sure thing that it will win support for a climate bill from undecided senators close to the oil industry, like Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, or Mary L. Landrieu, Democrat of Louisiana.

The Senate is expected to take up a climate bill in the next few weeks — the last chance to enact such legislation before midterm election concerns take over. Mr. Obama and his allies in the Senate have already made significant concessions on coal and nuclear power to try to win votes from Republicans and moderate Democrats. The new plan now grants one of the biggest items on the oil industry’s wish list — access to vast areas of the Outer Continental Shelf for drilling.”

[Emphasis added. Now what’s next, Barry? Full steam ahead on ANWR? — Ryking]

I don’t know much about this issue, but I think that offshore drilling is prevented by law.  this is just a “plan,” by the president.  GWB rescinded the executive order which prevented drilling off the east coast in 2008, and congress didn’t continue the ban in 2008 either.  so who knows?  I’m reading about it on wikipedia for chrissakes, can someone explain what this actually means?  hmm, another article says the congressional ban is still in place. 

What it means is that Obama is bending over backwards to accommodate Big Oil and the GOP, a major reversal of his position on the issue during the 2008 presidential campaign. Others might suggest that this is merely a ploy by Obama to curry favor with the aforementioned parties, that he knows Congress won’t support his proposal by passing legislation to overturn the ban, but I’ve found it best to take these things at face value. Assume Obama is just playing “eleventh-dimensional chess” and you find yourself screwed out of single payer universal health care or getting a no-strings-attached bail out of the financial industry. Or losing a coast free of oil spills. — Ryking

(Reblogged from diadoumenos)

ryking:

Obama argued against offshore drilling and supported a moratorium on it during his 2008 presidential campaign. (Via Huffington Post’s “Obama Oil Drilling Plan: East Coast, Alaska Waters Could Open For Drilling.”)

(Reblogged from diadoumenos)